Why Everyone Should Care About UIGEA
Many non gamblers have never heard of the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006 (UIGEA) and if they have heard if it they probably don’t think it affects them in any way. This law in essence deputizes banks and other financial institutions and gives these institutions powers over and above what current law allows.
To understand just what is at stake for the average citizen a brief history of how this law came to be is in order. The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006 was attached to a port security bill and was presented in a late night session of congress with no review and no time for debate. The bill had several prominent sponsors including, Bill Frist the GOP senate majority, Jim Leach, former chairman of the House Banking committee, Robert Goodlatte who co write the bill, and John Kyl. The bill was presented at midnight the day before congress adjourned for the 2006 elections. The gambling bill had been presented by itself and was defeated in the senate so the sponsors resorted to tacking it on a port security bill that no member of congress could possibly vote against without severe political repercussions. Exceptions were made for fantasy sports, horseracing, and lotteries. The bills main sponsors had connections to one or more of these industries.
There are many reasons why non gamblers should be concerned about the ban on internet gambling. First and foremost is the violation of the right to privacy which most Americans hold near and dear. Since the days of the American Revolution individual rights and personal freedom have been a hallmark of life in the
Since the passage of UIGEA many online payment processors such as Neteller have exited the
By banning activities that some find objectionable we are establishing a bad precedent. Using the logic behind UIGEA any activity could be banned for any reason no matter how innocuous that activity may be. In essence we are adding to the already too long list of victimless ‘crimes’. Given the state of national security today and the very real threat of terrorism do we really want valuable government resources wasted enforcing laws against activities involving consenting adults?
Banks and other financial institutions have had unwanted law enforcement responsibilities forced on them complete with rules that are vague at best. With these responsibilities come added expenses for these institutions which in all likelihood will be passed on to their clients no matter whether they gamble or not. This is essentially an unfunded mandate from government and the banking industry has no choice but to comply.
Credit card companies are also burdened with additional enforcement responsibilities. The credit card industry uses codes for various transactions including gambling. While it is relatively easy for the credit card industry to block gambling related transactions UIGEA opens the door for less than scrupulous companies to use uncoded transactions often involving offshore banks not subject to the same stringent regulations as US banks.
Gambling has a long and colorful history in the
Personal responsibility and liberty also are long standing American traditions. Studies show that most online gamblers are middle to upper middle class citizens, employed and otherwise law abiding. Most online gaming sites have programs in place to identify problem gamblers and the ability to deny credit card transactions from their accounts. Hopefully with a new administration due to take office in the 2008 elections we will see a return to common sense and personal liberty.






1 Comments:
Hi, just wondering if you would like to work together to build up back links using our blogs, I have got a couple of bingo blogs that we could use?
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home